While that’s sadly true, I think Seth is looking at the situation from the other point of view: most audiences prefer not to be Powerpointed. Particularly when the presenter is afraid of something. We’ve all done it, particularly as it’s the accepted wisdom: If in doubt, write some slides. I know I’ve sat through really crap presentations, bored and/or bewildered, only to unwittingly inflict exactly the same kind of thing on an audience the very next week.
Sure, being able to present without that prop is a challenge, but shouldn’t we try? Besides, how often has powerpoint made someone look as if they know more than they really do? And how often has the real message been lost in the time spent on making the slides look slick?
Seth offers a compelling alternative. Don’t be a “presenter” or “speaker”, whose aim is to tell people stuff. Be an “expert” or a “facilitator”, whose role is to engage, dialogue and learn. Different skills, but less like the dreaded public speaking. Not necessarily applicable in all circumstances, but always worth considering.
I believe reliance on Powerpoint weakens people’s presentation and dialogue skills, and diminishes the communication they might otherwise have with their colleagues and peers. It certainly has a place in the toolkit, but I wish more people would try to live without it just once in a while.