Comments on: the middle hexagon should be independent of the adapters

By: Why I don’t use spork « silk and spinach

Why I don’t use spork « silk and spinach — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:31:06 +0000

[...] much coupling, and in the case of a Rails app that usually means not enough separation between the domain objects and the adapters. So we’ve stopped running spork, so that we can feel the pain of the 15-second Rails load [...]

By: Hexagonal architecture: reprise « silk and spinach

Hexagonal architecture: reprise « silk and spinach — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:22:52 +0000

[...] While browsing around other folks’ blogs today I came across a link to a post I wrote back in March 2005. Six years on I think it still stands up, and so I commend it to you, dear reader: The Middle Hexagon Should be Independent of the Adapters. [...]

By: reflections on shotgun surgery « silk and spinach

reflections on shotgun surgery « silk and spinach — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:11:51 +0000

[...] because they didn’t seem serious. For example, I knew that some classes violated one of my central tenets of a good hexagonal architecture. But I told myself that was just a guideline — I shouldn’t push the code towards that [...]

By: callbacks break hexagonal architectures « silk and spinach

callbacks break hexagonal architectures « silk and spinach — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:33:15 +0000

[...] It’s because they break one of the essential ingredients of a hexagonal architecture: the middle hexagon should be independent of the adapters. Here’s [...]